Last all year long this time, I made it my New Year\’s resolution to take one extra flight of stairs every single day in the office. I arrive every morning smugly congratulating myself to be a superior human being because of not taking the escalator. Oh and I also happen to reside in a third-floor walk-up apartment. Nothing might have prepared me more for headlines today that how well you need to do on the new stair test could determine your chance of dying.
Those headlines are riffing off new research presented at a European Society of Cardiology meeting in Milan now. Spanish researchers found that high performers on an exercise test were built with a lower chance of death from heart disease, cancer, or other causes, and also the fitness level necessary for those life-extending benefits turns out to be comparable as fast climbing four flights of stairs without stopping.
Here\’s the way the study worked: Researchers recruited more than 12,000 individuals who had been identified as having or who have been thought to have coronary artery disease, aka damage or disease within the arteries that carry blood towards the heart. The research participants walked or ran on the treadmill during a test called exercise echocardiography to measure how their hearts taken care of immediately physical exertion.
Their fitness levels were calculated in what\’s called METs, or metabolic equivalents. One measly MET may be the energy it requires that i can sit in front of this computer (relatively) calmly. Individuals the research who could handle 10 METs of treadmill activity were deemed to become high performers around the test-or to possess good \”functional capacity.\”
There were big health wins for all those folks in the research: When compared with individuals with poor functional capacity, the high performers were less likely to die from cancer, cardiovascular disease, or other causes next 5 years approximately. For every additional MET achieved in the test, their chance of dying from those causes decreased by 9%, 9%, and 4%, respectively.
Without use of an expensive sci-fi treadmill setup, just how can us normals calculate our METs? This is where the stairs come in. \”There tend to be cheaper methods to estimate if you could achieve 10 METs on the treadmill test,\” study author Jes